Skip to content
GitLab
Projects Groups Snippets
  • /
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
  • Sign in / Register
  • funkwhale funkwhale
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributors
    • Graph
    • Compare
    • Locked Files
  • Issues 409
    • Issues 409
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
    • Iterations
    • Requirements
  • Merge requests 18
    • Merge requests 18
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
    • Test Cases
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Releases
  • Packages and registries
    • Packages and registries
    • Package Registry
    • Container Registry
    • Infrastructure Registry
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • CI/CD
    • Code review
    • Insights
    • Issue
    • Repository
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • funkwhalefunkwhale
  • funkwhalefunkwhale
  • Issues
  • #614
Closed
Open
Issue created Nov 18, 2018 by Devin Buhl@onedr0p

Simplify Docker Deployment

I am trying to do a deployment on Rancher w/ Traefik and the whole deployment is a bit overwhelming. It currently takes 6 containers to spin up Funkwhale. To me that sounds like a lot, other applications (e.g. Nextcloud) can usually make this into three or less containers. I am not saying that we combine Redis or Postgres into the main Funkwhale image, those are perfectly fine to be supported containers.

I would like to see a containers of:

  • Funkwhale (w/ frontend, api, celery worker and celery beat)
  • Postgres
  • Redis

Funkwhale appears to be a great alternative to .*sonic apps and if we simplify the Docker deployment strategy there could be more adoption.

Edited Nov 18, 2018 by Devin Buhl
Assignee
Assign to
Time tracking